In recent times, the plight of families entangled in the web of Child Protective Services (CPS) interventions has brought attention to the challenges within the system. This blog post aims to delve into the intricacies of CPS practices. Contrary to some beliefs, CPS workers do not enjoy prosecutorial immunity. Additionally, we will explore the specific case of Maya Kowalski, shedding light on the subtle favoritism CPS may receive from judges, law enforcement, and local nonprofits (to include nonprofit hospitals and helping agencies). This narrative underscores the need for transparency and reform within the CPS landscape.

The Dynamics of CPS Interventions

Child Protective Services, entrusted with ensuring the welfare of children, is a critical component of our societal safety net. However, recent cases, including the medical kidnapping of Maya Kowalski, have raised concerns about potential biases in favor of CPS interventions. This emphasizes the urgency of examining the relationships between CPS, the judiciary, law enforcement, and local nonprofits.

Maya Kowalski: A Heartbreaking Case Study

Maya Kowalski’s story exemplifies the struggles families face when navigating CPS interventions. The Kowalski family found themselves in a harrowing situation when medical professionals raised concerns about Maya, a 6-year-old girl with a rare medical condition. Despite the family’s best efforts, CPS stepped in, accusing them of neglect and abuse, ultimately leading to Maya’s separation from her family. This case underscores the delicate balance that must be struck between child safety and family preservation.

Favoritism: A Nuanced Challenge

While CPS workers do not have prosecutorial immunity, there’s a nuanced challenge arising from perceived favoritism within the legal and social services ecosystem. Judges, law enforcement officials, and local nonprofits may give deference to CPS decisions, assuming that the agency acts in the best interest of the child. This favoritism, intentional or not, can significantly impact the outcomes of cases and the lives of families involved.

Garber’s Call for Inductive Reasoning

In light of these challenges, Dr. Garber, a prominent expert in child welfare, calls for a shift towards inductive reasoning when considering the placement of a child. This approach emphasizes drawing general conclusions from specific observations, allowing for a more nuanced and individualized evaluation of each case. Inductive reasoning encourages a thoughtful consideration of the unique circumstances of a family, fostering better-informed decisions that prioritize both child safety and family unity.

Contrasting Inductive Reasoning with Deductive Reasoning

In contrast, deductive reasoning, which is a more conventional method, entails deriving specific conclusions from general principles or assumptions. While deductive reasoning has its merits in specific contexts, its application in CPS interventions may result in a more inflexible and potentially less accurate evaluation. Deductive reasoning relies on pre-established criteria, potentially overlooking the intricate details that render each family situation unique. It has been the pathway through which many local families have seen infants and children removed, only to be later exonerated by evidence that was not collected through inductive methods.

The Need for Transparency and Accountability

The absence of prosecutorial immunity emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability within the CPS system. Families navigating CPS interventions should be assured that decisions are made based on thorough assessments and a commitment to the best interests of the child. The role of judges, law enforcement, and local nonprofits should be scrutinized to ensure unbiased support for families and fair consideration of all perspectives.

Calls for Reform

In light of these challenges and the call for inductive reasoning by Dr. Garber, there is a growing call for reform within the CPS landscape. Advocates emphasize the need for increased oversight, training, and accountability measures to address any unintended biases in the system. Transparent communication between CPS, the judiciary, law enforcement, and local nonprofits is crucial to fostering an environment where decisions are made with the utmost care and consideration.

Community Engagement and Awareness

As we navigate these complexities, community engagement becomes paramount. It’s essential for individuals and organizations to stay informed about the CPS system, understand the rights of families involved, and advocate for reforms that ensure fairness and justice. Sharing experiences and insights, especially in cases like Maya Kowalski’s, can contribute to a broader conversation about the role of CPS in our communities.


While CPS workers may not have prosecutorial immunity, the nuanced issue of favoritism from judges, law enforcement, and local nonprofits, as seen in the heartbreaking case of Maya Kowalski, underscores the need for reform within the CPS system. Transparency, accountability, and community engagement are crucial elements in ensuring that interventions are carried out in a fair and just manner, always prioritizing the best interests of the child and respecting the rights of families. Dr. Garber’s call for inductive reasoning adds a valuable perspective to this ongoing conversation, emphasizing the need for a more individualized approach in determining the placement of children. Let’s continue the conversation and work towards a system that truly serves the well-being of our communities.

The Maya Kowolski story serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges surrounding medical kidnapping and the crucial need for reforms within the CPS system. By addressing false allegations of abuse we move closer to a system that upholds justice, transparency, and family preservation. As we strive for a balanced approach that prioritizes the well-being of children and respects the rights of families, Embrace New Life Counseling & Wellness stands at the forefront, offering solace and support to those parents unjustly caught in the crossfire.